On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:36 PM, Eliad Peller <eliad@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 20:57 +0200, Eliad Peller wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:14 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 15:05 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 12:04 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> >> > all three applied.
>>> >>
>>> >> Nope, dropped patch 2 again
>>> >
>>> > And dropped the other two also - with them the sequence of two tests I
>>> > was looking at never completes.
>>> >
>>> err... sorry about that.
>>> i'll look into it.
>>
>> I think there's probably two bugs - the test suite should wait for all
>> the DFS stuff to finish.
>>
>> But the fact that it never completes now is strange, maybe somehow radar
>> detection doesn't get turned off properly after your patches?
>>
> it's probably local->radar_detect_enabled doesn't get cleared.
> patch (3) fixes a similar issue, but there seems to be another one.
> (it seems that patch (1) exposed these issues, so i should probably
> reorder the patches and make it the last one)
>
ok, sent a new patchset.
there were some missing updates of local->radar_detect_enabled, so i
preferred to simply remove it altogether and check for radar detection
directly when needed (i.e. on scan/roc).
ap_ht_40mhz_intolerant_ap still seems to fail here, but it fails even
when running only this test, without any of my patches applied.
now i get the same error with my patches applied ("Exception: AP did
not move to 40 MHz channel") instead of the EBUSY one.
i'll try debugging this issue as well.
Eliad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
