On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 15:38 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Arik Nemtsov <arik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-01-06 at 11:56 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2015-01-01 at 13:42 +0200, Arik Nemtsov wrote: > >>> > When a system contains only self-managed regulatory devices all hints > >>> > from the regulatory core are ignored. Stop hint processing early in this > >>> > case. These systems usually don't have CRDA deployed, which results in > >>> > endless (irrelevent) logs of the form: > >>> > cfg80211: Calling CRDA to update world regulatory domain > >>> > >>> Applied. > >> > >> I take that back - dropped again. This was causing spurious messages in > >> the hwsim test run VM, saying something like "couldn't set reg domain: > >> -7". Maybe at that point not a single wiphy existed? > > > > Interesting. I guess I should fix this to only drop the request in > > case there's at least one self-managed wiphy. > > Could you point me to the hwsim test that failed for you? I don't think it was a specific test case - the message seems to have come during boot. OTOH, I also reverted some of Eliad's patches, so perhaps I should retest without those? > Also where is that message coming from? I don't see it in wpa_s or the kernel. I have no idea! I can't even explain where the -7 (-E2BIG) came from! johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
