On 12/24/14 08:20, Kalle Valo wrote:
Oscar Forner Martinez<oscar.forner.martinez@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Three lines with more than 80 characters per line have been split in several lines.
Signed-off-by: Oscar Forner Martinez<oscar.forner.martinez@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bcma/driver_chipcommon.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Just to handle the bureaucracy before v2 is submitted:
To which tree should this go to? I see that earlier John has applied
patches to drivers/bcma/, but what about now? Should I take these? John,
any suggestions?
It is a bit of an odd ball, but there are couple of wireless driver
relying on bcma and it is more than just a bus driver. It also does some
steps of the device initialization (which is convenient, but not sure I
like it). So I would hope it can stay with wireless subsystem to catch
issue caused in that area early on.
Regards,
Arend
Oscar, the patchwork entry for this patch looked odd. I'm guessing it
was because your time (or timezone) is wrong:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5535751/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
