On Fri, 2014-12-19 at 10:59 +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote: > Looking at this again I wonder if it would be of value to have this as > NL80211_EXT_FEATURES_ATTR_LEN in nl80211.h so user-space can check the > nla_len() against it and detect API in-compatibility. Just can not use > DIV_ROUND_UP() in that case. What's your opinion? Well, userspace must not check it since it should be compatible with new kernels ... That was kinda my original point about not liking it in the header to start with :) johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
