On Monday 08 December 2014 16:18:18 Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 9:02 PM, Pali Rohár
<pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 December 2014 13:49:54 Pavel Machek wrote:
> > /**
> >
> > + * request_firmware_prefer_user: - prefer usermode helper
> > for loading firmware + * @firmware_p: pointer to firmware
> > image
> > + * @name: name of firmware file
> > + * @device: device for which firmware is being loaded
> > + *
> > + * This function works pretty much like request_firmware(),
> > but it prefer + * usermode helper. If usermode helper fails
> > then it fallback to direct access. + * Usefull for dynamic
> > or model specific firmware data. + **/
> > +int request_firmware_prefer_user(const struct firmware
> > **firmware_p, + const char *name,
> > struct device *device) +{
> > + int ret;
> > + __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
> > + ret = _request_firmware(firmware_p, name, device,
> > + FW_OPT_UEVENT |
> > FW_OPT_PREFER_USER); + module_put(THIS_MODULE);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_firmware_prefer_user);
>
> I'd like to introduce request_firmware_user() which only
> requests firmware from user space, and this way is simpler
> and more flexible since we have request_firmware_direct()
> already.
>
> Thanks,
> Ming Lei
Ming, for wl1251 NVS data we need to load use usermode helper and
fallback to direct load. So I think it is better to handle this
request in firmware code and not in driver.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
