On Fri, 28 Nov 2014 23:40:46 +0100
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > @@ -5094,8 +5094,9 @@ static int b43_op_beacon_set_tim(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> > {
> > struct b43_wl *wl = hw_to_b43_wl(hw);
> >
> > - /* FIXME: add locking */
> > + mutex_lock(&wl->mutex);
> > b43_update_templates(wl);
> > + mutex_unlock(&wl->mutex);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Does anyone remember why this simple solution wasn't implemented
> earlier? Michael?
I think the callback used to be (is?) in atomic context.
> Nicholas: did you test it anyhow?
--
Michael
Attachment:
pgpfSrh0atAtO.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
