On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 10:18 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 22:13 +0800, YanBo wrote: > >> > But is all of that really the right way? I'm not completely convinced. >> >> Except set the flag, the HW itself should support this feature, or >> else it also doesn't work, I'd >> send the patch in soon for public review. > > Yeah, but is it really the right way to advertise VHT? In the spec, VHT > means you also have 80 MHz support - do you really think you can/will do > 80 MHz on 2.4 GHz? Seems like all of this will cause more corner cases. > >> > Agree with you that it need a bigger discussion about whether advertise VHT is the suitable/best way to support the VHT at 2.4G feature. We are considered this ways as it is already be used by some vendor like BRCM or Qualcomm Atheros in there full mac product, and there will be IOT issue if there are kinds of different implementation. Thanks BR /Yanbo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
