From: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
ath10k_tx_wep_key_work() acquires conf_mutex, so
cancelling it when conf_mutex is already taken
in ath10k_remove_interface() is incorrect, so
move it outside the lock.
Snippet from the lockdep report:
kernel: ======================================================
kernel: [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
kernel: 3.18.0-rc5-wl-debug #34 Tainted: G O
kernel: -------------------------------------------------------
kernel: hostapd/451 is trying to acquire lock:
kernel: ((&arvif->wep_key_work)){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff810872d5>] flush_work+0x5/0x290
kernel: but task is already holding lock:
kernel: (&ar->conf_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa0b99f00>] ath10k_remove_interface+0x40/0x290 [ath10k_core]
kernel: which lock already depends on the new lock.
Signed-off-by: Sujith Manoharan <c_manoha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
index 01de6f3..cf1e579 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
@@ -3043,10 +3043,10 @@ static void ath10k_remove_interface(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
struct ath10k_vif *arvif = ath10k_vif_to_arvif(vif);
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
-
cancel_work_sync(&arvif->wep_key_work);
+ mutex_lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
+
spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
ath10k_mac_vif_beacon_cleanup(arvif);
spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
