On Fri, 2014-08-22 at 10:54 -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> if (res.type == RTN_BROADCAST) > >> goto brd_input; > > > > Is this place better, after checking for RTN_BROADCAST? > > > > /* ARP link-layer broadcasts are acceptable here */ > > if ((skb->pkt_type == PACKET_BROADCAST || > > skb->pkt_type == PACKET_MULTICAST) && > > skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_IP)) > > goto e_inval; > > Indeed, this would make ARP happier, but that still leaves open the > issue of CLUSTERIP. I'm back looking at this, but must admit I'm completely confused now :-) I could add an IPv4 sysctl to control this behaviour: 0 - off 1 - RFC 1122 "SHOULD" 2 - also drop unicast-in-multicast (for wireless) But I guess due to cluster-IP it would have to default to 0. However, talk about ip_local_deliver_finish() in this thread has me wondering if we could just implement it using iptables? I guess ipt_addrtype and ip6t_addrtype would let me do that? johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
