It's not completely unsurprising - the initial channel estimate and such is done at the beginning of each packet and stays constant. So if there's some varying channel conditions that change that during the duration of a packet, the tail end is going to end up having less SNR and may end up getting more errors. -adrian On 24 October 2014 09:04, Ali Abedi <a2abedi@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello, > > We study the effects of 802.11n frame aggregation on throughput. We noticed > a > strange pattern in the MPDU loss within an aggregated frame. It seems that > the > second half of the MPDUs (those with higher sequence numbers) in an > aggregated frame > are more likely to be lost. Is this a known fact or is there any explanation > for it? > > For example if 32 frames are aggregated with sequence numbers 100 to 131. > Frames with sequence numbers 100-115 are more likely to be received > correctly > than 116-131. > > > Best, > Ali > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
