Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ath10k: speed up hw recovery

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 October 2014 10:17, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> In some cases hw recovery was taking an absurdly
>> long time due to ath10k waiting for things that
>> would never really complete.
>>
>> Instead of waiting for inevitable timeouts poke
>> all completions and wakequeues and check if it's
>> still worth waiting.
>>
>> Reading/writing ar->state requires conf_mutex.
>> Since waiters might be holding it introduce a new
>> flag CRASH_FLUSH so it's possible to tell waiters
>> to abort whatever they were waiting for.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> While applying to ath-next-test there was a conflict in core.h. Please
> check my resolution:
>
> https://github.com/kvalo/ath/commit/6cccda0185c7df96f439dc3f87961e81843de3ee

I think it was `enum ath10k_cal_mode {` vs `enum ath10k_scan_state {`
because my patch was based without your cal patches.

Anyway - looks good, thanks!


Michał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux