On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 05:22:05PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 11:43 -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > > From: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Otherwise, 'iwconfig wlan0 key off' with no key set results in: > > > > Error for wireless request "Set Encode" (8B2A) : > > SET failed on device wlan0 ; No such file or directory. > > And what is the problem with us telling iwconfig that there was no key? > You should argue for iwconfig ignoring that particular problem, but I > don't think we should do so in the kernel. Why is it a problem? How does it hurt anything? How is it useful to return an error? FWIW, other drivers seem to accept it. I don't see why we need to complain. John -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
