John W. Linville wrote: > Hmmm...am I missing something? > > CC drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.o > In file included from include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:4:0, > from ./arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/byteorder.h:4, > from include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h:5, > from ./arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:506, > from include/linux/bitops.h:33, > from include/linux/kernel.h:10, > from include/linux/skbuff.h:17, > from include/linux/if_ether.h:23, > from include/linux/etherdevice.h:25, > from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/ath9k.h:20, > from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c:17: > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c: In function ‘ath9k_build_tx99_skb’: > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c:74:37: error: ‘struct ath_tx’ has no member named ‘seq_no’ > hdr->seq_ctrl |= cpu_to_le16(sc->tx.seq_no); > ^ > include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:34:51: note: in definition of macro ‘__cpu_to_le16’ > #define __cpu_to_le16(x) ((__force __le16)(__u16)(x)) > ^ > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.c:74:19: note: in expansion of macro ‘cpu_to_le16’ > hdr->seq_ctrl |= cpu_to_le16(sc->tx.seq_no); > ^ > make[3]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/tx99.o] Error 1 This is my mistake. I did not test with CONFIG_ATH9K_TX99 enabled, sorry. I'll send an updated series. Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
