Search Linux Wireless

Re: IBSS RTNL assertion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Looks like there is number of places in the code where
> sta_info_destroy(sta); is not called under rtnl_lock nether under rcu
> lock...

sta_info_destroy() may not be called under RCU lock. I'll take a look at
this, it seems simply a missing rtnl_lock() in some of the IBSS code.
IBSS is a bit of a special case unfortunately.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]
  Powered by Linux