I wrote:
and eth1394 to deal with temporary lack of of tlabels. Alas I just
recently received a report that eth1394's workaround is unsuccessful
on non-preemptible uniprocessor kernels.
(I haven't started working on a fix, or opened a bugzilla
ticket for it yet. The reporter currently switched his kernel to
PREEMPT which is not affected.)
now logged as http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10306
The failure in the workaround is *not* about the in_atomic() being the
wrong question asked in hpsb_get_tlabel() --- no, ieee1394's in_atomic()
abuse works just fine even on UP PREEMPT_NONE. Instead, the failure is
about kthreads not being scheduled in the way that I thought they would.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- --== =-==-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
