From: Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:21:46 +0100 > Yeah, good point. Should I rename it to HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS > or similar? Or have it defined as some sort of number so you can make > actually make tradeoffs? Like Dave Woodhouse suggested at some point to > have get_unaligned() take an argument that indicates the probability... Yes, that name and something with a "score" of some sort would be nice. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
