2014-09-09 22:27 GMT+04:00, John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: >> 2014-09-05 15:33 GMT+04:00 Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> > Hi Sergey, >> > >> > On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 15:12 +0400, Sergey Ryazanov wrote: >> >> 2014-09-05 14:10 GMT+04:00, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> >> > On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 13:46 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: >> >> >> Having this conversation every rc1 is getting a bit silly. Could >> >> >> Jiri >> >> >> e.a. perhaps set some specific deadline for ATHEROS_AR231X to be >> >> >> submitted? >> >> > >> >> > I waited until rc3. Have you seen any activity on this front? If >> >> > not, >> >> > should I resend the patch that removes the code in mainline that >> >> > depends >> >> > on ATHEROS_AR231X (ie, AHB bus support)? >> >> > >> >> Recent activity always could be found in [1]. Now I finish another one >> >> round of cleanups and have a plan to fix several things (you can >> >> always find something that you really want to improve). But if you >> >> insist I could immediately switch to "send upstream" mode. And seems >> >> that this would be better approach. >> >> >> >> 1. https://dev.openwrt.org/log/trunk/target/linux/atheros >> > >> > And where can the related PULL requests or patch submissions be found? >> > >> I have not sent patches yet, since I thought that it would be easier >> to cleanup them in openwrt tree and then send them upstream. > > That excuse has worn a bit thin. Perhaps Paul should repost his > removal and you can add a revert to the start of your patch series? > As for me, I do not like such flapping, but you have a final say in this discussion as a maintainer. -- BR, Sergey -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
