On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 11:11:07PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> This is required to split SoC bus init into two phases. The later one
> (which includes scanning) should be called when kalloc is available.
>
> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> John: please note this patch touches arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c
>
> This patches is a first step of simplifying MIPS booting process on
> Broadcom SoCs. My research described in:
> > Booting bcm47xx (bcma & stuff), sharing code with bcm53xx
> e-mail thread explained how we could get rid of all these early scanning
> tricks. The main idea is to postpone bus initialization a bit and use
> all standard calls then. So far we were doing it so early we had to
> avoid kalloc.
> ---
> arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c | 4 ++++
> drivers/bcma/host_soc.c | 11 +++++++++--
> include/linux/bcma/bcma_soc.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c
> index 2b63e7e..fff6ed4 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/bcm47xx/setup.c
> @@ -202,6 +202,10 @@ static void __init bcm47xx_register_bcma(void)
>
> err = bcma_host_soc_register(&bcm47xx_bus.bcma);
> if (err)
> + panic("Failed to register BCMA bus (err %d)", err);
> +
> + err = bcma_host_soc_init(&bcm47xx_bus.bcma);
> + if (err)
> panic("Failed to initialize BCMA bus (err %d)", err);
>
> bcm47xx_fill_bcma_boardinfo(&bcm47xx_bus.bcma.bus.boardinfo, NULL);
This hunk looks wrong. Is it missing indentation? Or should a line
be removed at the top?
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx might be all we have. Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
