Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ath10k: introduce a stricter scan state machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>> @@ -2323,8 +2348,6 @@ void ath10k_halt(struct ath10k *ar)
>>>               ath10k_monitor_stop(ar);
>>>       }
>>>
>>> -     del_timer_sync(&ar->scan.timeout);
>>> -     ath10k_reset_scan((unsigned long)ar);
>>>       ath10k_peer_cleanup_all(ar);
>>>       ath10k_core_stop(ar);
>>>       ath10k_hif_power_down(ar);
>>
>> Why you don't call ath10k_scan_reset() here? I would have assumed that
>> you do that.
>
> Hmm.. Good catch.
>
> Anyway I need to work on this patch a little bit more and fix another
> corner case.

Ok, I'll drop this patch and wait for the next version.

-- 
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux