> > Right, in software we can keep a phase1 per AC but we don't need to in > > hardware since that's just the optimisation. > > Correct, I'm just not sure how it's done for bcom cards. I'm not entirely sure right now either. > Eventually you want to update RX phase1 key into HW so you get your > CPU utilization where it have to be, right? Yeah, you would :) But that's something we're addressing anyway since iwlwifi needs it too. > > > Phase1 for TX and RX are not the same, again because of the simple > > > reasone that number of transmitted and received packet is not the > > > same. > > > > Hm, right. But if we go for pull mode for TX, we only need to have push > > mode for the phase1 rx key when that changes, no? > > Emmanuel has prepared patches for TX pull mode (phase2 only for now) . > If this OK wiith I will resend the whole TKIP series with this change, > leaving RX in pull mode. You mean "RX in push mode" I think. Could you change that to a new callback or so then as we discussed? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
