On Sun, 2014-07-20 at 14:32 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> @@ -2192,6 +2193,12 @@ static int nl80211_set_wiphy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> return result;
> }
>
> + if (info->attrs[NL80211_ATTR_WIPHY_DYNACK]) {
> + result = rdev_enable_dynack(rdev);
> + if (result)
> + return result;
> + }
I think it may be better to handle this in the call that's normally used
(coverage class setting), but allow the other attribute to make a sort
of "dynamic coverage class". And internally, calling drivers, it seems
fine to pass -1 or so since you can extend the datatype there, instead
of introducing a new internal callback. External/internal doesn't always
have to match perfectly.
Additionally, you'll need some capability flag I think.
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
