On 10-07-14 22:24, Tom Gundersen wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Arend van Spriel <arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 10-07-14 10:17, Tom Gundersen wrote: >>> The name is given by the firmware, so we assume it is predictable. >> >> How about the scenario where one would have multiple broadcom wifi >> devices in the system. Both driver instances would alloc_netdev with >> predictable but also the same ifname. Wondering whether we should ignore >> the firmware ifname altogether. > > Hm, that would just fail irrespective of this patch, right? Sounds > like ignoring the firmware names is the right thing to do. True. I realized that when starting to type my reply. I think at the moment we never run into the scenario that trigger this code path. Will make a separate patch for that. Probably on top of your changes. Regards, Arend > Cheers, > > Tom > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
