On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 09:50 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 18:21 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > diff --git a/lib/vsprintf.c b/lib/vsprintf.c > [] > > static noinline_for_stack > > +char *escaped_string(char *buf, char *end, u8 *addr, struct printf_spec spec, > > + const char *fmt) > [] > > + if (spec.field_width == 0) > > + /* nothing to print */ > > + return buf; > [] > > + len = spec.field_width < 0 ? 1 : spec.field_width; > > If field_width is not specified, emit a single byte? A single byte to be escaped (it might be \000, for example, on output). > Perhaps better if -1 was accepted by string_escape_mem > as a strlen request or just ignored as a 0 length is > above. Would it be any benefit here? > fyi: hex_string emits nothing on printk("%ph", buf); Works just fine. How did you check it? pr_info("%ph\n", in); => test_string_helpers: 1b (I suppose "\n" flushes a buffer for me.) -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> Intel Finland Oy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html