2008/3/11 Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 05:35:32PM -0700, Chatre, Reinette wrote: > > sorry for the delay - please do submit a bug at bughost.org to enable us > > to track this problem. > > > > The error you get is strange - the reason why the channel could not be > > set was because the device is not considered to be ready. Yet, from your > > debug log all the required steps appear to have completed successfully. > > Could you please add a print to the function > > iwl4965-base.c:iwl4965_is_ready to see what the value of priv->status > > is? > > I don't have this problem in 2.6.25-rc3 and rc4. However, it seems that the > card does not associate with AP if I set iwcofnig wlan0 essid any. Is this > a bug or a feature? The AP does not use key and is visible. > It looks more like mac80211 bug but frankly I would prefer if this 'any' feature will be not supported. It has security implications. The decision about to which AP to associate should be left solely to user space. Tomas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
