On Saturday 07 June 2014 19:01:20 Larry Finger wrote: > As you have learned here, automatically making changes suggested by some tool > may convert a visible bug into one that is invisible, and only found by a > detailed line-by-line examination of the code, and that is unlikely to happen. > Please be careful. > > From everything I see, the test in all drivers should be > > if ((bt_msr & MSR_AP) == MSR_AP) That only happens to be case because MSR_INFRA | MSR_ADHOC == MSR_AP. This seems to be the intent: #define MSR_MASK 0x03 if ((bt_msr & MSR_MASK) == MSR_AP) In rtl8192se, there are also MSR_LINK_... constants covering MSR_... and in addition, there is a MSR_LINK_MASK. These macros are quite redundant though given the other definitions, but the mask is still nice to have I guess. Also, personally I would submit just one patch touching all drivers, but I see that Rickard has submitted a bunch of patches (without cover letter either, making it more difficult to group them). What would you prefer, a single patch touching multiple drivers (as the changes are mostly the same) or split patches? Kind regards, Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html