Hi, On 05/28/2014 11:36 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 04:18:29PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> With level triggered interrupt mask / unmask will get called for each >>> interrupt, doing the somewhat expensive mux setting on each unmask thus is >>> not a good idea. Instead move it to the set_type callback, which is typically >>> done only once for each irq. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Yes move it out of mask/unmask but no, not into set_type(). >> >> Can you not use the irqchip startup()/shutdown() callbacks >> instead? > > I think we can use irq_request_resources then > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/12/307 Sounds good, I'll modify the patch to move it here before posting a v2 of this series. Note v2 likely won't happen till this weekend, -ENOTIME. > We could even merge the gpio_to_irq code into it. Erm, no we need that as a separate function for the gpio_chip's to_irq callback. > It's called in __setup_irq, so it's guaranteed to be called, and it > will bail out early without doing anything, since it's one of the > first thing __setup_irq does. Right, as I said above, this sounds good. Regards, Hans -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
