Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 25 May 2014 09:53, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> This prevents leaving incomplete scatter-gather
>>> transfer on CE rings which can lead firmware to
>>> crash.
>>>
>>> Reported-By: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> The title is a bit misleading as usually the commit log with the word
>> revert means that the commit is reverting another git commit. Maybe
>> something like this is better:
>>
>> ath10k: drop incomplete scatter-gather pci tx transfers
>
> Good point. I was actually thinking 'abort' .. 'properly'.
Sounds good to me.
>>> +err:
>>> + for (; i > 0; i--)
>>
>> Isn't this just a fancy way to say 'while (i-- > 0)'?
>
> Not really. More like do { .. } while (--i > 0), no? First iteration
> must use unmodified `i`.
Ok, I missed that. Then the for loop is good here.
--
Kalle Valo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
