On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:58 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 10:01 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > > > So.. which patch are we going forward with? Luca's or mine? Either way > > is fine with me as long as we reach a conclusion :-) > > Looks like both are missing some things? Luca's doesn't have tracing, > and supports just a single interface (which you'll not like :) ) but > personally I liked the struct API a bit better than multiple double > pointer arrays you had. What do you mean mine doesn't support tracing? Check the bottom of the patch again. :) I don't think it's the most beautiful code, but it seems to work. :) Also, my patch *does* support multiple vifs. But the code we have doesn't support it, so I call the new op with a single-vif only. Michal's patch doesn't call the new op (only on a later patch), so it's pretty much the same. -- Luca. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
