On 23 May 2014 10:51, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 08:09 +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > >> >> +#define IEEE80211_MAX_NUM_SWITCH_VIFS 8 >> > >> > :-) >> > >> > That seems artificial though - why not dynamically allocate? >> >> I tend to avoid dynamic allocations whenever I can. I can make it >> dynamic if you want. > > I'm just thinking that Ben Greear will invariably complain about this > limit ;-) I see your point now.. :D >> I think I've had the same problem when I was trying to make a >> single-call multi-vif csa tracing. Is using dynamic_array for this >> really doable? I haven't found any code in the kernel using >> __dynamic_array for anything but simple scalars and buffers. > > You could either use multiple arrays, or I guess you could even pack a > struct into the array, no? Packing is not a problem - reading/using is. How do you print an array of structs in a trace? I think I've played around this a little but gave up for some reason I don't remember anymore. Michał -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
