On Wed, 2014-05-21 at 13:19 -0700, Paul Stewart wrote: > > Is it really that bad to demand the firmware notify the host? It's not > > like this is a very frequent event, and if querying is supported then > > notification can't be all that much more difficult. > > I think firmware vendors are coming to the point of view that they > must minimize host processor wakeups. They may argue from that > perspective that the firmware should divulge such information only on > request. That's reasonable, but the request could also be "list all TDLS peers please", right? Then you could still implement it very easily. It doesn't have to be an event. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
