Search Linux Wireless

Re: [PATCH] regulatory: don't rule out some valid rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2014-04-13 at 16:15 +0300, Eliad Peller wrote:
> commit 6d87df6 ("regdb: allow 40 MHz on world roaming
> channels 12/13") in wireless-regdb did the following
> change:
> 
> -        # Channel 12 - 13. No HT40 channel fits here
> -        (2457 - 2482 @ 20), (3, 20), PASSIVE-SCAN, NO-IBSS
> +        # Channel 12 - 13.
> +        (2457 - 2482 @ 40), (3, 20), PASSIVE-SCAN, NO-IBSS
> 
> in order to allow HT40+ on lower channels (such as 9).
> 
> However, the current regulatory rules verification forbids
> such rules, as 2482 - 2457 < 40.

For better or worse, this is how the rules verification was defined. I
don't like this definition either and think the whole "max bandwidth"
thing was done badly in the original implementation, but this is
userspace API.

To bust this limit would mean to change the rule interpretation quite
significantly, I don't think we can do that without more analysis on why
it's safe or won't matter for the regdb.

However, we have the NL80211_RRF_AUTO_BW flag now, which presumably
could also be somehow set for the rule here to solve this issue?

johannes

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Host AP]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Wireless Personal Area Network]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Kernel]     [IDE]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]

  Powered by Linux