On Mon, 2014-04-14 at 16:03 +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote: > From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Users may need information about the expected throughput I think this "expected throughput" should be a bit clarified. Are you talking about "expected PHY rate" or rather "expected (payload) throughput"? > towards a given peer computed by the RC algorithm. > Export such value in Mbps/100 through the get_station() API. "units of 10Kbps" might be a better description :-) > This unit has been chosen because it is the same of the > throughput returned by MinstrelHT. Since it's unlikely we'll ever reach the limit of a u32, maybe just multiply by 10 to get the nicer Kbps? > + * @expected_throughput: expected throughput in Mbps/100 reported by the RC > + * algorithm towards this station. The unit of this value has been chosen > + * because it is the same of the throughput returned by MinstrelHT I think the rationale shouldn't be here now. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
