On Thu, 2014-04-17 at 21:27 +0800, Zhao, Gang wrote: > Dynamic debug function wiphy_dbg() is more convenient for debugging, > and if user doesn't enable CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG, it will fall back to > normal static debug, just as what wiphy_debug() does. Hi. Your premise is not correct. wiphy_debug will always emit a message. wiphy_dbg will only emit a message when #DEBUG is #defined or CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG is enabled and the message is specifically enabled by the dynamic_debug control file. > When all the users of wiphy_debug() are gone, wiphy_debug() can be > removed. Not really. Please use git format-patch --cover-letter when sending a patch series so that these sorts of replies can be done to the cover letter of the series instead of individually. Using a cover-letter "[PATCH 0/N]" also makes it easier for maintainers to send acknowledgements if applying the entire series. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
