On 09/04/14 22:39, Johannes Berg wrote: > diff --git a/net/wireless/scan.c b/net/wireless/scan.c > index 7d09a712cb1f..746c56ebd66c 100644 > --- a/net/wireless/scan.c > +++ b/net/wireless/scan.c > @@ -540,6 +540,8 @@ struct cfg80211_bss *cfg80211_get_bss(struct wiphy *wiphy, > continue; > if (channel && bss->pub.channel != channel) > continue; > + if (!is_valid_ether_addr(bss->pub.bssid)) > + continue; Wouldn't it be better to prevent such entry to end up in the bss list at all? (i.e. filtering during the scan?) Cheers, -- Antonio Quartulli
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
