The brcms_attach function is defined as static but the comment is saying that it should not be static or gcc will issue a warning. I believe we can remove the comment as I don't se a problem with this function being defined as static. Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emilgoode@xxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c index 93598cd..8c5fa4e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c @@ -1092,12 +1092,6 @@ static int ieee_hw_init(struct ieee80211_hw *hw) * Attach to the WL device identified by vendor and device parameters. * regs is a host accessible memory address pointing to WL device registers. * - * brcms_attach is not defined as static because in the case where no bus - * is defined, wl_attach will never be called, and thus, gcc will issue - * a warning that this function is defined but not used if we declare - * it as static. - * - * * is called in brcms_bcma_probe() context, therefore no locking required. */ static struct brcms_info *brcms_attach(struct bcma_device *pdev) -- 1.7.10.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
