Felix Fietkau wrote:
> - if (ah->opmode != NL80211_IFTYPE_AP &&
> - aniState->ofdmWeakSigDetect != weak_sig) {
> - ath9k_hw_ani_control(ah,
> - ATH9K_ANI_OFDM_WEAK_SIGNAL_DETECTION,
> - entry_ofdm->ofdm_weak_signal_on);
> - }
> + else if (AR_SREV_9300_20_OR_LATER(ah) &&
> + ah->opmode != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION)
> + weak_sig = true;
> +
> + if (aniState->ofdmWeakSigDetect != weak_sig)
> + ath9k_hw_ani_control(ah, ATH9K_ANI_OFDM_WEAK_SIGNAL_DETECTION,
> + weak_sig);
Any reason why this has been changed to disregard the WS-DET parameter from
ofdm_level_table[] ?
Sujith
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
