On 28 February 2014 10:00, Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> HTT Rx endpoint processes both frame rx
>> indications and frame tx completion indications.
>>
>> Those completions typically come in batches and
>> may be mixed so it makes sense to defer processing
>> hoping to get a bunch of them and take advantage
>> of hot caches.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michal Kazior <michal.kazior@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> [...]
>
>> +void ath10k_htt_txrx_compl_task(unsigned long ptr)
>> +{
>> + struct ath10k_htt *htt = (struct ath10k_htt *)ptr;
>> + struct htt_resp *resp;
>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>
> I think this can be a static function. Is it ok if I change this patch
> with the diff below?
I don't really mind.
Michał
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
