> > static bool cfg80211_go_permissive_chan(struct
> cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
> > struct ieee80211_channel
> > *chan) @@ -621,8 +623,14 @@ static bool
> cfg80211_go_permissive_chan(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
> > ASSERT_RTNL();
> >
> > if (!config_enabled(CONFIG_CFG80211_REG_RELAX_NO_IR) ||
> > - !(wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_ENABLE_RELAX_NO_IR)
> ||
> > - !(chan->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_GO_CONCURRENT))
> > + !(wiphy->regulatory_flags & REGULATORY_ENABLE_RELAX_NO_IR))
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + if (regulatory_indoor_allowed() &&
> > + (chan->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_INDOOR_ONLY))
> > + return true;
> > +
> > + if (!(chan->flags & IEEE80211_CHAN_GO_CONCURRENT))
> > return false;
>
> Shouldn't this check go before the indoor one?
>
I do not think so, as this relaxations is orthogonal to the GO concurrent one. It means that If a channel is enabled but only under indoor and indoor operation is hinted the relaxation removes the NO_IR restriction if such exists (without the relaxation indoor operation would be allowed but not for GO).
Regards,
Ilan.
��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{���zW����ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
