On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 08:30:18AM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What if there is a pci-e card in the future that needs _PCI bit ? > > I don't follow, the member is for struct pci_dev so its either a pci > or pci-express device. If you mean what if we later have some srev in > the range that is not pci-e, well then we'd use srevs wouldn't we? > > > I guess for now we can work on with srevs to be safe but it's good to > > know of that feature, thanx ;-) > > The point is that if there is already a variable we can use to detect > if a device is pci-e then we shouldn't introduce any other new ones. ACK for Luis's point. -- John W. Linville linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
