I see. OK. If that's the proper way to do it, then so be it. The performance hit should be negligible since to 99% it's all the same etherType. > -----Original Message----- > From: David Miller [mailto:davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 20:14 > To: Kretschmer, Mathias > Cc: arend@xxxxxxxxxxxx; sw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [net-next v2 3/3] cfg80211: add MPLS and 802.21 classification > > From: "Kretschmer, Mathias" <mathias.kretschmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:11:05 +0000 > > > Will take a look. Thx. Need to check if there is also a way to set the > > protocol number when using TX_RINGs, where we use one send() call to > > signal the kernel that a bunch of frames (with potentially different > > protocol numbers) is ready for consumption. > > You will have to make seperate TX_RING sends() for each cluster where the > protocol changes. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
