On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 04:35 -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 10:21:24AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is part of a larger patchset actually adding that > > "system_power_efficient_wq", but maybe it'd be better to expose a > > function as an API rather than the wq struct? > > > > Something like > > > > scheduled_delayed_work_pwr_efficient(...)? > > While there are some benefits to using dedicated functions for > specific workqueues, I don't think it brings enough benefits to > justify adding dedicated API and am unlikely to add new ones. Fair enough, I guess I'll take those patches in. johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
