On 28/01/14 14:01, Kalle Valo wrote: >> - Patch is getting resent because I did not CC'd the linux-wireless mailing list in >> my previous attempt. :) > > Oh, I missed that. Anyway, in previous version I commented about > documenting NULL usage. What do you think about that? Well documentation is always good :) If it is need I will add it. However, I'd rather ask you what ath6kl is trying to do in that case, since it's the only driver invoking cfg80211_ibss_joined() with a zero BSSID (and now a NULL channel) on IBSS leave. From the cfg80211 prospective, that call is seen like a notification of being connected to a new BSS having zero mac and NULL channel. I don't see how this can be useful at all, also because after leaving the IBSS I imagine that no other operation will take place on that vif unless it reconnects again. Cheers, -- Antonio Quartulli
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
