On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Grumbach, Emmanuel <emmanuel.grumbach@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> So, I guess you are taking what I sent ? >> > >> >Haven't really made up my mind yet ... I think it's more correct, so I >> >should, but I also don't really want to break the ralink drivers over >> >what seems to me to be a fairly small issue. >> >> I think I'm fine with this now. Let's just see if someone experiences any >> issues ... >> >> Furthermore I think i even remember that you can force ralink HW to stop a >> BA session. But all in all lets better comply with the spec ... > > Well - you need to see what "stop a BA session" mean. If you are able to tell the HW no AMPDUs anymore *now*, then ok - but you still have the out-of-order TX problem. Unless you use the same TX queue for AMPUs and non-AMPDUs and don't fear reordering issues We shouldn't have reordering issues in rt2x00 since AMPDUs and MPDUs go through the same hw queue. However, at the moment the hw will keep on sending AMPDUs that are in the TX queue even after we received a DELBA. But this is an issue with the ralink drivers ... Helmut -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
