On 20 January 2014 11:55, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 09:32 +0100, Janusz Dziedzic wrote: >> Introduce NL80211_RRF_STRICT_BW regulatory rule flag. >> This mean we will check only banwidth defined in >> regulatory database and not check contiguous rules. > > If you meant for this to alleviate my concerns about crda/db.txt > compatibility, you didn't do it right. This has no value whatsoever > since it still breaks things. > So, maybe better introduce opposite logic here. By default always calculate BW as STRICT_BW - be backwards compatible with current crda/db.txt implementation/calculation. And introduce WIDE(LOOSE)_BW flag for the rules we would like calculate maximum bandwidth using contiguous rules? BR Janusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
