Wojciech Dubowik wrote: > I guess I won't be able to reproduce bad scan results with wireless > testing since I have > changed scan reporting to pure rssi in my openwrt compat. > In normal case you get a sum of rssi and noise floor and it will be > correct i.e. when > NF is shifted by 14db so will be rssi. > So it's just my use case. > > Anyway I have just solved the issue by applying calibrated noise floor > values from eeprom > instead of nominal in nf_get functions and nf histogram. Now the rssi > seems stable in my test > environment. I have just started testing but it looks promising. I don't see how that would fix the issue. The race still remains since there is a window between NF cal init and completion. The results of the calibration depends on the environment and using default values from the eeprom will not fix this, I think. Sujith -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
