On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-12-26 at 13:42 +0000, Chaitanya Tata wrote: >> In case the driver sends MCS9 and doesn't advertise CBW >> (or) advertises 20MHz bandwidth, return the timestamp As is, >> instead of returning 0 as timestamp. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya T K <Chaitanya.mgit@xxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> net/mac80211/util.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/mac80211/util.c b/net/mac80211/util.c index 06265d7..bc92b25 100644 >> --- a/net/mac80211/util.c >> +++ b/net/mac80211/util.c >> @@ -2265,7 +2265,7 @@ u64 ieee80211_calculate_rx_timestamp(struct ieee80211_local *local, >> if (WARN_ONCE(!rate, >> "Invalid bitrate: flags=0x%x, idx=%d, vht_nss=%d\n", >> status->flag, status->rate_idx, status->vht_nss)) >> - return 0; >> + return ts; > > I think this is wrong - we've already warned, we know we have no usable > timestamp, and this should never happen anyway. Timestamp is just off by packet length (as we dont have proper MCS rates), but still we can use it as un-rewinded timestamp. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
