> Yeah; you're right. I'm not sure there's a good way to do this unless
> there's some way the ipw2100 passes back the channel number each frame
> was received on.
There is nothing obvious in the structures in the header file. That
was my first plan of attack to fix the problem.
> But also ignoring the check in update_network() will cause the signal
> strength of networks to be lower than they should be, because the frame
> bled over to a different channel.
Well i would prefer to have lower strengths than way outdated
strengths from the first packet received.
Andrew
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
