于 2013/12/23 21:47, Felix Fietkau 写道: > On 2013-12-23 06:11, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> Use the recently added and possibly more efficient >> ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. > It looks to me like all of these (including the ones in the other > similar patches) are in places, where the address data is aligned to at > least 16 bit. Because of this, using ether_addr_equal instead of > ether_addr_equal_unaligned would be much better for platforms without > CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. > > - Felix Yes, the most of the place should use ether_addr_equal. thanks. Regards Ding > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
