On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 09:08:50AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-12-16 at 16:00 -0600, Seth Forshee wrote:
>
> > +void ieee80211_notify_rx(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
> > +{
> > + switch(rx->sdata->vif.type) {
> > + case NL80211_IFTYPE_MONITOR:
> > + ieee80211_mgd_notify_rx(rx);
>
> This ... seems wrong.
Yeah, it is. I guess there's always been enough tx while I was testing
to keep the dynamic ps timer updated.
> Also, we already have ieee80211_sta_rx_notify() which you want, I think?
I'm not sure, that's called earlier in the rx handlers. I guess that
probably only matters if there's an rx error, and the only penalty is
coming out of PS briefly. So I could probably use that instead.
> With this change, do you even still need local->ps_sdata?
Some of the code still uses ps_sdata, but I do remove it in a later
patch. I might be able to remove it here, but it's easier to do it when
the managed code changes to use the PS module.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
