On Thu, 2013-11-14 at 07:18 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > Think of the other way around, such as plugging in a stupid USB NIC just > > to see if it works - and suddenly finding your 5 GHz connection broken > > because that USB NIC said it really needed some stupid country with 2.4 > > only. I'm not convinced. > > Actually your example is a good one that I'd use to make my case, But what's your case? Why trust a just-plugged-in USB NIC more than an already-present PCIe NIC? > but I > can also see this being like a sledge hammer. What if we only quiesce on > wdevs of types: > > o NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC > o NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT > o NL80211_IFTYPE_AP > o NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_GO At least we should then also have that patch that QCA has somewhere about reporting to userspace that AP was stopped :P johannes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireless" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
